friendyousohard: (My hair static requires further study)
Twilight Sparkle ([personal profile] friendyousohard) wrote2013-09-07 10:25 pm

22nd Spell: [Video/Action for Route 38]

[The video clicks on with a view of a Magnezone hovering over the long grass, peering around as though looking for something. After several moments, it turns back to the gear and shakes its body back and forth, looking remarkably like a shaking head.]

Well, it's not surprising. I did have to search for weeks to find you, after all.

[The Magnezone bleeps unintelligibly at the gear. Even those who can understand Pokemon (and other Pokemon themselves) will only hear noises that sound oddly like R2-D2.]

Maybe someone else has one you can talk to. [The gear turns around to show Twilight's face.] A question. Well, two. First off, who out there has a Pokemon from the Magnemite line? And second, does anyone else have... trouble communicating with them? Of course most of us can't understand Pokemon when they talk, but even my other Pokemon can't seem to understand anything Tesla has to say. Are there other Magnemites who seem to have that issue? For that matter, other Pokemon in general? It's something I've never even heard of before.

Hmmm... and on a more general topic, here's something I've been wondering about for a while. If you were to take six Pokemon, start them at level one, and try to train them together as a coherent team, which ones would you pick? I've been considering the idea for a while now, and while I'm not certain it's practical to start right now I'd like to start gathering input.
freshprints: (PONDER ❈ so she'd been eating tex-mex)

text;

[personal profile] freshprints 2013-09-08 04:23 am (UTC)(link)
Are you looking to cultivate a special team specifically for challenging the gyms?
freshprints: (ASIDE ❈ ishimaru's tripping balls again)

text;

[personal profile] freshprints 2013-09-08 04:49 am (UTC)(link)
An experiment of what variety?
freshprints: (CONTENT ❈ you suck and that's sad)

text;

[personal profile] freshprints 2013-09-08 04:55 am (UTC)(link)
I'm surprised that's a hypothesis in need of testing. Any creature specifically trained to work in a group should inherently be a better team player than one without that specialized training, shouldn't it?
freshprints: (PONDER ❈ so she'd been eating tex-mex)

text;

[personal profile] freshprints 2013-09-08 05:17 am (UTC)(link)
If that's how you're doing it, then presumably you'll also need to control against possible variations in species — meaning, two teams to observe, one in which all members were trained independently but then taught to work as a group afterward, and one in which all members were trained as a group from the very beginning. They'd need to mirror each other in species, type, and team role, and you'd have to examine them once they were all at the same level to control for possible variations that way.

It'd be quite the undertaking, going about it like that..
freshprints: (ASIDE ❈ ishimaru's tripping balls again)

text;

[personal profile] freshprints 2013-09-08 05:05 pm (UTC)(link)
I've heard something about them. The nature of a Pokemon has some bearing on its skills and strengths, or something to that effect?
freshprints: (BLANK ❈ my favorite game is qwop)

text;

[personal profile] freshprints 2013-09-09 02:44 am (UTC)(link)
Meaning for your test to be truly valid, you would need a set of Pokemon with identical natures in both test groups, as well.
freshprints: (CONTENT ❈ you suck and that's sad)

text;

[personal profile] freshprints 2013-09-09 03:06 am (UTC)(link)
That's true. It may not be a perfect experiment, but it should at least tell you something.